My lawyer represented me in the case of unfair competition disputes involving collusive bidding between the plaintiff Mr. Re (Beijing) Catering Co., Ltd. and the defendant Jilin Province Jiujiu Industrial Group Co., Ltd. and other four companies.

In March 2015, our law firm was entrusted by the plaintiff Mr. Re (Beijing) Catering Co., Ltd. and appointed lawyer Jiang Shanhe to represent him and the defendants Jilin Province Jiujiu Industrial Group Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Jiujiu Company"), Beijing Shishitianlechu Catering Management Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Shishitianlechu Company"), Pan>Beijing Ririxin Food Co., Ltd. and Beijing Yiyujia Catering Management Co., Ltd.Collusion in bidding and unfair competition dispute case (hereinafter referred to as "this case").

On June 29, 2016, the People’s Court of Chaoyang District, Beijing issued the (2015) Chao Min (Zhi) Chu Zi No. 20024 Civil Judgment: 1. It was confirmed that the bid of the defendant Beijing Shitian Lechu Catering Management Co., Ltd. in the bidding project involved in the defendant Jilin Province Jiujiu Industrial Group Co., Ltd. was invalid; 2. The defendant Jilin Province Jiujiu Industrial Group Co., Ltd. and the defendant Beijing Shitian Lechu Catering Management Co., Ltd. took effect. Within ten days from the date of entry into force of this judgment, the defendant Mr. Re (Beijing) Catering Co., Ltd. shall jointly compensate the plaintiff Mr. Re (Beijing) Catering Co., Ltd. for economic losses of 250,000 yuan; 3. The defendant Jilin Province Jiujiu Industrial Group Co., Ltd. and the defendant Beijing Shitianlechu Catering Management Co., Ltd. shall jointly compensate the plaintiff Mr. Re (Beijing) Catering Co., Ltd.

The defendantBeijing Shitianlechu Catering Management Co., Ltd. and the defendant Jilin Province Jiujiu Industrial Group Co., Ltd. appealed against the first-instance judgment.

On June 27, 2017, the Beijing Intellectual Property Court issued the (2016) Beijing 73 Min Zhong No. 905 Civil Judgment: rejecting the appeal and upholding the original judgment.

This case involves the application of law: first, whether this case falls within the scope of the Bidding and Bidding Law; second, whether Jiujiu Company and Shitianlechu Company jointly committed unfair competition by colluding in bidding; third, the determination of legal liability.

The judicial verdict in this case: First, it serves as a warning to senior executives who often "change jobs" by poaching "customers" from their original work unit and harming the company's interests; second, the affiliated company has assumed relevant legal liability for compensation; third, fairness and justice have been upheld.